Deliverable 03 · Activity 3.3
Training And Capacity-Building Curriculum
Three Learning Pathways For Schools, Districts And System Partners.
The Behavioral Health Performance Management (BHPM) Training And Capacity-Building Curriculum defines the professional learning provided to school teams, local educational agency (LEA) leaders, and system partners to support the use of behavioral health information in practice.
- Due
- September 30, 2026
- Sections
- 6
- Lead
- Impacter Pathway · Deveau Burr Group
Implementation Workplan Crosswalk Activity 3.3 · Exhibit A Section VI, Deliverable 3
Activity 3.3 · Section 02
Pathway 2 · LEA Behavioral Health Performance Management
Five modules building LEA capacity to use aggregate behavioral health and implementation evidence across schools, and to maintain a recurring performance-management process.
Scope This Section Answers
Data-informed goal setting using baseline screener results, PDSA cycles, interpreting dashboard data, leading data walkthroughs, customization to each LEA's local context, and ongoing coaching and support.
Purpose And Audience
Pathway 2 builds LEA capacity to use aggregate behavioral health, implementation, and related information to understand performance across schools, recognize strengths and areas for growth, support implementation, inform program and resource decisions, and maintain a recurring behavioral health performance-management process.
As in Pathway 1, module topics identify areas of learning rather than a required sequence.
Module 1: Behavioral Health Measurement And Performance Indicators
Topics
- From Student Voice To LEA Performance Information. The relationship among student-level information, grade and group aggregates, school aggregates, and LEA aggregates, including appropriate privacy and use at each level.
- Behavioral Health, Implementation, And Existing LEA Indicators. Use screening information alongside attendance, chronic absenteeism, academic progress, engagement, service utilization, participation and reach, implementation information, and other established district indicators.
- Asset-Based Performance Measurement. Use aggregate information to identify demonstrated strengths and positive change as well as areas for growth, without reducing cross-site review to school ranking.
LEA leaders can define the behavioral health performance questions they need to answer and identify the data level and contextual information appropriate to each question.
Participants create a concise LEA performance view identifying which information answers each management question and where that information is reviewed.
Module 2: Cross-Site Data Analysis, Dashboard Interpretation, And Performance Walkthroughs
Topics
- Cross-Site Dashboard Interpretation. Review school aggregate patterns, grade and cohort patterns, change over time, participation and reach, and implementation indicators.
- Leading Cross-Site Data Walkthroughs. Review strengths, patterns, variation, implementation context, related attendance, academic and program information, management questions, and next actions.
- Behavioral Health, Academic, And Implementation Outcomes. Examine whether behavioral health patterns align with attendance, engagement, academic performance, transition outcomes, implementation variation, or established programs without inferring causation.
LEA leaders can facilitate a cross-site walkthrough using behavioral health, implementation, and at least one existing district data source.
Leaders conduct a cross-site performance review and identify findings that warrant recognition, site-level follow-up, district inquiry, differentiated support, or additional evidence.
Module 3: Integrating Behavioral Health Evidence Into Program, Professional Learning, And Resource Decisions
Topics
- Connecting Evidence To Existing Programs And Systems. Review patterns alongside district MTSS, PBIS, counseling and wellness programming, transition supports, Community Schools, attendance initiatives, academic supports, and family engagement.
- Program, Professional Learning, And Resource Decisions. Consider whether available evidence supports reinforcing an existing practice, adjusting professional learning, providing implementation support, adapting a program, examining staffing or resource alignment, or gathering additional information.
- Action, Inquiry, And Escalation. Identify decisions within LEA authority, questions requiring additional evidence, and barriers requiring support from broader system partners.
The LEA can demonstrate a decision process connecting behavioral health information, implementation context, existing programs and supports, action or inquiry, ownership, and follow-up.
Participants trace an authentic LEA management question through behavioral health, implementation, academic, attendance, or program information and the district decision process.
Module 4: LEA Behavioral Health Performance-Management Systems
Topics
- Governance, Existing Meetings, And Decision Protocols. Identify where behavioral health review occurs, how information is prepared and interpreted, what decisions belong at site, program, and executive levels, and how decisions and support return to schools.
- Baseline-Informed Goals And Existing LEA Outcomes. Use behavioral health baselines to inform established priorities where appropriate, including attendance, academic engagement, school climate, transition outcomes, priorities aligned to the Local Control and Accountability Plan (LCAP), and student-support outcomes.
- Site-To-LEA Information Flow And Differentiated Support. Establish processes for sites to share strengths, patterns, implementation learning, barriers, and support needs, and for the LEA to provide professional learning, coaching, implementation support, program decisions, resources, and cross-site learning.
The LEA has an operating process specifying relevant data sources, review structures, cadence, goals, decision rights, differentiated support, communication to sites, follow-up, and escalation.
The LEA develops or refines its behavioral health performance-management routine within existing leadership and management structures.
Module 5: Continuous Improvement, Implementation Monitoring, And Practice Sustainability
Topics
- PDSA Across Behavioral Health, Implementation, And Related LEA Outcomes. Use shared improvement questions to examine whether intended practices occurred, what subsequent behavioral health information shows, how relevant attendance, academic, engagement, and service indicators changed, and how results varied across sites.
- Cross-Site Learning, Adaptation, And Spread. Use principal networks, communities of practice, or program meetings to examine implementation, local conditions, and results before extending a practice more broadly.
- Maintaining Behavioral Health Performance Management. Integrate ownership, recurring data walkthroughs, protocols, goal review, professional learning, site support, leadership routines, onboarding, and existing planning cycles.
The LEA can demonstrate a cross-site improvement cycle and identify an existing organizational process that will maintain behavioral health performance review, implementation monitoring, and follow-up.
Leaders conduct an authentic cross-site improvement cycle and identify the organizational practices needed to maintain performance management.
Customization And Delivery
The five modules define common LEA capacities. Professional learning is adapted to LEA size, organizational structure, staffing, distribution of responsibilities, existing cross-site review processes, professional learning and leadership time, calendars, and implementation needs.
A smaller LEA may have one leader responsible for several student-services, behavioral health, MTSS, and program functions. A larger LEA may distribute those responsibilities across departments and leadership roles. The curriculum therefore identifies the functions needed for behavioral health performance management rather than prescribing universal job titles.
Delivery may occur through in-person or virtual professional learning, leadership meetings, district MTSS and program meetings, principal meetings, facilitated data walkthroughs, cross-site learning, individualized technical assistance, and coaching.
Behavioral Health Champions
Behavioral health champions are central participants in implementation and capacity building. The role is defined by function rather than by a standard job title.
At the LEA level, a behavioral health champion may be a director of student services, district social worker, behavioral health or wellness lead, or another staff member with responsibility for implementation and data use. At the school level, the role may be held by a counselor, wellness coordinator, assistant principal, lead social worker, or another member of the site team.
The appropriate champion depends on the LEA or school's staffing model, funding structure, organizational responsibilities, existing behavioral health infrastructure, and decision-making processes.
Professional learning and coaching are therefore tailored to the champion's responsibilities, authority, prior experience, and position within the organization. A wellness coordinator serving as a site champion may need different facilitation and leadership support than an assistant principal or counselor. A districtwide social worker may require different support than a director of student services in a smaller LEA who holds several related responsibilities.
Capacity building supports champions in applying BHPM practices within the responsibilities they already hold and, over time, supporting those practices with greater independence.
Activity 3.5 provides the comprehensive Technical Assistance Plan, including how this curriculum will be delivered and supported over the contract period. · Implementation Workplan Crosswalk Activity 3.3 · Exhibit A Section VI, Deliverable 3

