00 · Overview & The Activities
What Deliverable 2 Answers
Deliverable 2 answers one question for the Commission: what should a school behavioral health performance management system count, and how does it know the counts are trustworthy. It proposes an indicator set, organizes that set under the Commission's four reporting domains, and defines the one composite score reported as the program's flagship outcome measure: the Behavioral Health Performance Index.
Seven literature-review sections were compiled under Activity 2.1 between May and July 2026; the stakeholder engagement record is Activity 2.2; the index methodology is Activity 2.4; and the brief itself, version 2a, was synthesized under Activity 2.5 in August 2026. Activity 2.6 carries it into structured review with all six LEA teams. Deliverable 2 is due to the Commission on 30 October 2026 and final on 30 November 2026.
| Activity | What It Produces | Lead | Where It Stands |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2.1 05/01/26–07/30/26 | The literature review: seven sections and the annotated bibliography behind them. | Impacter Pathway · Stanford Medicine | Written · sections 01–07 below |
| 2.2 07/01/26–07/30/26 | Stakeholder sessions with LEA and county staff, and the crosswalk of each LEA's local framework onto the Commission's four domains. | Deveau Burr Group | Sessions run · component 09 |
| 2.3 | The candidate indicator set sorted into the Commission's four reporting domains. | Impacter Pathway | Written · component 04 |
| 2.4 | The Behavioral Health Performance Index: formula, bands and missing-data rule. | Impacter Pathway | Version 0.9 · component 08 |
| 2.5 08/01/26–08/29/26 | The Metrics Brief itself, synthesized from 2.1 through 2.4. | Impacter Pathway | Version 2a · component 10 |
| 2.6 from 09/01/26 | LEA structured review, then submission to the Commission. | SCCOE | From 1 September 2026 |
| 2.7 | Project management and administration across Activities 2.1–2.6. | SCCOE | Ongoing · no document |
What Activity 2.6 Settles
Three things in this record are settled by the Activity 2.6 structured review with all six LEA teams. The index weighting, banding and cadence questions run through that review. The stakeholder engagement record carries the mapping pattern the consultations use, and Deveau Burr Group's session log carries the count and the per-LEA breakdown. And the service-utilization indicators appear as reporting categories with a feasibility flag rather than as figures, because each waits on billing or data-sharing infrastructure some sites do not have yet.
This record is the same content in the current reading format. The earlier Deliverable 2 working design (the same seven sections with their interactive evidence tables, diagrams and source cards) is preserved unchanged in the archive, and is where the diagrams referenced throughout these components are drawn.
The evidence base, the index methodology and the brief itself sit in one record, each traceable to the workplan activity that produced it.