Indicators, Outcomes & Metrics Brief
What should a school behavioral health performance management system count, and how does it know the counts are trustworthy? This working draft answers that question across seven literature-review sections, a stakeholder engagement record, a full index methodology, an annotated bibliography, and a core-document artifact library.
Deliverable 2 Activity Map
The five Deliverable 2 activities with real output published so far — 2.1 through 2.5, in order, each with what it produces, who leads it, and where the real output lives. This is the structural map; the section-by-section reading view is below.
- Activity 2.1Done · All 7 Sections Live
The Literature Review
Seven-section review of the peer-reviewed and technical literature grounding BHPM's indicator set and BHPI construction, covering screeners, authentic-voice measurement, automated-scoring standards, MTSS process/outcome indicators, implementation science, composite-index construction, and IMPACTER's own research lineage, plus the full annotated bibliography behind it.
Lead: IMPACTER Pathway & Stanford Medicine05/01/26–07/30/26 - Activity 2.2Live · Session Log At DBG
Stakeholder Engagement
Structured sessions with LEA behavioral health leads, counselors, site administrators, county behavioral health department staff, and BHSSA grantees. The sessions name the measures the people who’d report them actually think are worth counting, and crosswalk each LEA’s existing local framework onto the Commission’s four reporting domains.
Lead: Deveau Burr Group (DBG), with SCCOE clinical staff & Breaking Barriers California support07/01/26–07/30/26 - Activity 2.3Live · Diagram Published In Section 4
Align Indicators To The Commission's Four Domains
Sorts the candidate indicator set into the Commission's four reporting domains (services provided; student demographics & characteristics; service utilization; student outcomes & impact measures) as a domain-alignment diagram and table inside the Section 4 literature review.
Lead: IMPACTER Pathway - Activity 2.4Live · Methodology v0.9
Define The Behavioral Health Performance Index
The BHPI itself: the real weighted formula (Voice 40% · Behavior 20% · Engagement 16% · Academic 12% · Service Receipt 12%), the missing-data renormalization rule, and the four performance bands (Emerging → Developing → Establishing → Leading), reported inside Domain 4 · Outcomes & Impact.
Lead: IMPACTER Pathway - Activity 2.5Live · Version 2a
Synthesize Into The Metrics Brief
Deliverable 2a itself: the proposed indicator set organized by Commission domain, the real BHPI formula and Wellness Index layer, and the working indicator-count-by-domain chart, synthesized from Activities 2.1–2.4 for LEA structured review under Activity 2.6.
Lead: IMPACTER Pathway08/01/26–08/29/26
Brief at a Glance
The same Activity 2.1 literature review, read as seven sections, plus the standing reference tiles — index methodology, stakeholder engagement, the draft Brief, bibliography, and artifacts.
The Screener Landscape: What Schools Measure Today
What screeners districts already use, and the structural gaps between them.
Section 2From Self-Report to Authentic Voice: Language as Measurement Signal
Why language-based measurement is a distinct signal from self-report checklists.
Section 3Trustworthy Automated Scoring: The Evaluation Standards
The agreement statistics and standards automated scoring is held to.
Section 4Process & Outcome Indicators in MTSS-Aligned Behavioral Health
The candidate indicator set mapped to the Commission's four reporting domains.
Section 5Implementation Science & Process Evaluation
How BHPM instantiates implementation-science frameworks from readiness through learning groups.
Section 6Composite Index Construction
How the four domains roll up into a single Behavioral Health Performance Index.
Section 7IMPACTER Research Lineage
The academic lineage behind IMPACTER's measurement and scoring approach.
Stakeholder Engagement
DBG-led sessions with LEAs and county staff, crosswalking local frameworks onto the Commission's four domains.
Index Methodology
How the four domains roll up into one Behavioral Health Performance Index.
Metrics Brief (Draft 2a)
The draft Deliverable 2a itself: the indicator set by domain, the real BHPI, and the working counts behind it.
Bibliography
Every source, grouped by section, resolved and verified.
Artifacts
Core documents behind the Brief, embedded where open access allows.
This site publishes no student-level data. All figures are aggregate, de-identified, and reviewed under FERPA, COPPA, and California student privacy law (AB 1584).
Prepared in support of SCCOE under BHSOAC Contract No. 25BHSOAC019.